At last,after 5 months the PMO orders Health Ministry to take action on the complaint petition against Bill Gates and officials of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) filed by Secretary General of Human Rights Security Council
1.The Under Secretary of Government of India, Shri. Sanjay Kumar Chaurasia in his letter dated 29.12.2021 has written to the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, North Block, New Delhi thus;
“Subject: A self-explanatory representation – regarding.
The undersigned is directed to forward herewith a copy of following petition for action as appropriate:
Details of petition
Brief of the petition
Registration No. PMOPG/D/2021/0208618 Dated 02.09.2021 received from Shri M.A Shaikh, R/o 4 Gauri Compound Near GoraiKhadi LT Road Borivali, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
Petitioner has requested for CBI investigation against the against the accused person for death of 8 female childrenas detailed/mentioned in the petition.
2.The complaint petition dated 02.09.2021 was registered with the Prime Minister office as PMOPG/D/2021/0208618.
The prayers in the petition were as under;
“(i). Immediate direction for implementation of Parliamentary Committee’s 72nd Report and recommendations of investigation and prosecution of office bearers of ‘toxic philanthropist’ and Vaccine Syndicate’s Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the concerned officials of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) responsible for death of 8 female children because of unauthorized, unlawful & unapproved vaccines;
(ii). Immediate direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for registration of First Information Report (FIR) for investigation and strict action under sections 115, 109, 302, 307, 304, 419, 420, 471, 474, 188, 505, r/w 120 (B) & 34 of IPC& sections of Disaster Management Act 2005 and other provisions of the special acts against all the anti-national, anti-humanity elements, bio terrorists, ‘Pharma Syndicates’, ‘Tech Syndicates’ and ‘Tech Bullies’, who are involved in offences against entire humanity which are genocide (Mass Murders) of the citizens, caused by their acts of commission and omission related to Covid-19 pandemic as detailed in the draft charges given in the present complaint.
(iii). Immediate direction to concerned Authorities;
i) To issue Lookout Notices/Lookout Circulars (LOC) and arrest warrants against the accused whose involvement is ex-facie proved; ii) To initiate action for attachment of movable and immovable properties of all of the accused and their companies;
iii) To commence custodial interrogation of the accused; iv) To conduct a Lie –Detector Test, Brain Mapping Test, Narco Analysis test of all the prime accused such as Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Dr. RandeepGuleria, Mr. Arvind Kejriwal Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey and others, on the grounds explained in this Representation-cum-Complaint.
(iv). Immediate direction to all the authorities to;
(i) Seriously consider the American Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) White Paper on Covid-19 and experimental vaccine candidates.
(ii) To not to force anyone for vaccination and strictly abide by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts regarding the fundamental right of each citizen to his/her choice of treatment.
(iii) To inform the public about real dangers of the vaccine.
(iv) To inform the public about other proven, safe and more effective medicines.
(v) To not to spread fear about any further wave without verifying science evidence.
(v). Appropriate Direction as per the Report submitted by the Expert Committee to the office of Hon’ble Prime Minister with recommendations to not to administer vaccines on persons who have recovered from Covid-19 infection and have antibodies developed within their bodies.
(vi). Immediate direction for providing protection to all the Whistle-blowers and their witnesses who have already exposed and continue to expose the Syndicate comprising of BIG PHARMA, BIG TECH and BIG SCIENCE.
(vii). Direction for constituting separate enquiry committee regarding the timing of sudden waning of panic around the second corona wave in India which was fuelled by incessant reporting in media over shortage of oxygen and this panic and how & why the said hype got vanished after the investigation in ‘Tool Kit’ was commenced by the Delhi Police.”
3.After much deliberations and consultations, finally thePrime Ministerhas directed his Under Secretary to forward the grievance to Health Ministry with specific instruction for appropriate action.
4.In his 132-page complaint (refer all the documents below), the complainant has provided all proofs of the crimes committed by the Vaccine Syndicate headed probably by Bill Gates.
5.In another case of unauthorized experimental trials of HPV vaccines causing death of 8 female children, the Parliamentary committee of India has already recommended investigation and prosecution against various persons including office bearers of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).
6.The said report is already held to be legally admissible evidence by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India in Kalpana Mehta’s case(2018) 7 SCC1.
7.The complainant has also arraigned Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Mr. Jack Dorsey of Twitter and officials of Google, YouTube etc.
8.The complaint also urges for providing immediate protection to all the Whistle blowers and their witnesses who have already exposed and continue to expose the Vaccine Syndicate comprising of Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Science.
9.The Complainant has requested Indian Bar Association to represent his case before all forums and to take it to its logical conclusion.
10.The Indian Bar Association has already taken legal action against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan for her role in spreading disinformation and suppressing data on the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
11.The complainant has relied on following important evidences:
Parliamentary Committee’s 72nd
Audit Report of committee appointed by the Supreme Court of India.
Effects of ongoing investigation by Delhi Police regarding ‘Corona Toolkit’.
Anthony Fauci’s Covid-19 Dossier prepared by Dr. David E. Martin.
America’s Frontline Doctors White Paper on Covid-19 Experimental Vaccine Candidate.
Scientific Data given by Front Line Critical COVID-19 Care Alliance (FLCCC), British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Panel (BIRD), Research Square.
Earlier attempts by Bill Gates to kill Children in Polio doses explained in an article by GreatGameIndia.
Earlier attempts of false pandemic of Swine Flu by officials of WHOand European Unions enquiry on it.
Data provided by the volunteers of Awaken India Movement and many other authentic and scientific data and related articles.
12. MAIN CHARGE AGAINST ALL THE ACCUSED.
12.1.On the basis of materials, evidence and proofs of sterling nature the accused are liable to answer the following charge which is ex-facie proved.
12.2.The main accused Bill Gates and his allies of GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations) hatched a conspiracy to create a fix market for their vaccines and other drugs and in said conspiracy they joined other accused;
i) Bill Gates
i) Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to the President of US
ii) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization
iii) Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization
iv) Mark Zuckerberg, Chief Executive Officer of Facebook
v) Jack Dorsey, Chief Executive Officer of Twitter.
vi) Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim, YouTube (Google).
vii) Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister, Delhi
vii) Many others as mentioned in Annexure-T13 and many other who which can be joined after thorough investigation.
12.3.In furtherance of said conspiracies they committed overt acts and following acts of commission and omission:
i) Created fake data.
ii) Suppressed and dishonestly concealed the actual data.
iii)Twisted the material facts.
iv) Created narratives and conspiracy theories.
v) Prepared policies of YouTube, Twitter, Facebook etc. to suppress and stop the truth and real information reaching.
vi) Removed the original and scientific information from platforms like YouTube, Twitter and others on the basis of bogus policies which are against the scientific data.
vii) Published bogus and sponsored ‘fact checks’ to counter the truth and to create confusion in the mind of common public and to discourage the people, Scientists and Doctors who possess scientific data.
viii) Managed to take control of Government Health Agencies of many countries to get the policies and rules framed to suit their ulterior purposes.
ix) Allowed the people to die but insured that, people should not get the easily available, safe and affordable medicine such as Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D3 and Ayurvedic, Naturopathic treatments.
x) This was done to create fear in the minds of people so that the vaccine can be portrayed as the only alternative to save their lives and this would pave the way for easy Emergency Use of Authorization (EUA) of unapproved vaccines.
xi) The dangerous effects of vaccine were suppressed and the accused managed many ‘media houses’ who covered it up.
xii) The inefficiency of vaccines and death of many people and many doctors even after getting two doses of vaccines were twisted, concealed, suppressed and people were misguided with the help of straw man fallacies.
xiii) The deaths due to vaccines were underreported by creating rules suitable to them.
xiv) They tried to counter the Real Science with the help of rhetoric i.e. Bogus Science, strawman fallacies, sophistry, intellectual dishonesty and Pseudo Scientific conspiracy theories.
xv) The mastermind of the conspiracy and head of Vaccine Syndicate Mr. Bill Gates has been already found guilty of unlawful and unauthorized trials of vaccines and causing death of 8 female children and Parliamentary Committee of India’s RajyaSabha in their 72nd Report dated 28.08.2013 have already recommended for legal action against office bearers of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, officials of ICMR and other various accused responsible for such heinous crimes against humanity.
xvi) All the accused were and are well aware that by way of their acts of commission and omission they are going to cause death of millions of innocent people.
But they have chosen money over the human values.
They are the offenders of humanity. They are guilty of Genocide.
They committed cold blood mass murders.
They have taken away the livelihood of common man and made the life of poor people no less than hell. Due to their conspiracies, many people who managed to survive by taking their wrong and harmful medicines are now suffering with serious side effects which have made their lives miserable.
They don’t deserve any sympathy or leniency. Else it will be injustice to all victims and injustice to all mankind.
The minimum punishment in this case will be the;
(a) Death penalty and
(b) Taking over all their movable & immovable properties and distributing it equally to all the people across the world.
13.The Index of the complaint is as under:
“1. Findings of Parliamentary Committee about previous offences of murder through vaccines and it covers up by ‘toxic philanthropist’ and ‘Vaccine Syndicate Kingpin Bill Gates in conspiracy with officials of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
2.Recommendations by Parliamentary Committee for investigation against Bill Gates and other accused through premier Investigation agency i.e. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
3. Confirmation of legality of Report by Parliamentary Committee by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India.
4. A] Earlier attempt by accused who official to declare false pandemic:
[B] The H1N1 swine flu pandemic was “fake,” and its threat to human health was hyped, and that WHO’s policies were influenced by vaccine manufacturers who benefited from the pandemic virus.
4 A.The American Front line Doctors White Paper on Covid-19 experimental vaccine candidates.
5.Chronology of offences committed by accused as per their conspiracy to commit mass murders i.e. genocide for creating market for unapproved vaccines by accused Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other vaccine Syndicates.
6.Role played by each accused in execution of the conspiracy
7. Need for thorough and detailed investigation of some co-conspirators in ‘Main Stream Media’ (MSM) involved in the conspiracy.
8. Need for issuing Non-bailable arrest warrants against all the accused.
9. Need for immediate direction for attachment of all movable & immovable properties of the accused.
10.Provisions of Indian Penal Code attracted in the present case.
11. Scientific frauds regarding RTPCR Test
12.Misconception of Asymptomatic transmission
13.Scientific frauds regarding Mask:-
14.Scientific frauds regarding vaccines and legal position for non-mandatory vaccinations.
15. Is it a real pandemic?
16.Legal position settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India & various High Courts in India regarding the proofs required to prosecute the conspirators.
17.List of the specific area and issues requiring through investigation of all the accused, their toxic charity foundations and other various persons involved in the conspiracy.
18.Role of officials of UN Human Rights Division by their act of commission & omission in allowing the accused to commit the offence of genocide.
Need for condemning and exposing the selective amnesia and double standards of United Nations Human Rights Division by intervening on 11th June, 2021 for alleged violation of rights of Twitter but willfully keeping quiet for continuous, gravest violation of fundamental rights of people across the world by Twitter, YouTube, Facebook etc. by not allowing the renowned doctors and public to discuss the effectiveness of medicines like ‘Ivermectin’ on social media, only because it is against the vested interest of Vaccine Syndicate.
19. Need for immediate passing a Special Act constituting a Special Court/Tribunal headed by former Chief Justice of India Shri R. M. Lodha to decide the similar cases of vaccine Syndicates in a time bound manner of 2 months from its filing, only one appeal to special dedicated bench of Supreme Court to decide it within 3 weeks from filing.
20.Need for investigation into cause for delay of around 8 years in investigation and prosecution of accused Bill Gates and others under Section 115, 304, 109, 302, 409, r/w 120(B) of Indian Penal Code in his earlier offences related with murder of 8 female children through HPV vaccines, despite the specific findings and recommendations given by Parliamentary Committee in 72nd Report to Rajya Sabha.
21. Need for investigating the role of former CJI Deepak Mishra & other two Judges of the Supreme Court of India Shri Prafulla Pant and Shri Rohinton Fali Nariman under Section 218, 219, 120(B) & 34 of Indian Penal Code for framing the questions related with disputed question of facts which are beyond the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and actually in the domain of Investigating Agency and the trial court but malafidely framed in the Supreme Court only to delay. The adjudication and prosecution of accused Bill Gates and thereby to demoralize the victims and law loving citizens.
22. Main charge against all the accused.”
Download Related Documents :-
A copy of letter dated 29.12.2021 sent by PMO can be downloaded here:
Vaccine Mandate Case – Chief Secretary of Maharashtra Debashish Chakrabarty is guilty of contempt and perjury for filing false affidavit by concealing the facts, claims the Petitioner in his Rejoinder Affidavit
Petitioner Shri. Yohan Tengra has also sought prosecution of Dr. Sadhana Tayade, Director of Health Services, Public Health Department for similar offences under section 52, 191, 192, 193, 199, 200, 201, 202, 218, 471, 474, 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of Indian Penal Code.
All the accused officials and ministers are charged with section 409, 166, 52, 109 etc. of IPC and section 51(b) and 55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005 for bringing unlawful mandates which are ultimately going to reap wrongful profit of thousands of crores to vaccine companies and additionally putting the life of citizens in danger.
Prosecution of Respondent No. 10 Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray is sought as per provisions of section 120(B) of IPC for his involvement in the conspiracy to bring such unlawful mandates.
The reason for coming up with such suggestions by the Task Force Members is also exposed by pointing out their links with Pharma & Vaccine Companies and their agent NGOs like Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).
The state has not denied the serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation of thousands of crores of rupees and therefore as per the law, they have admitted it.
The concluding paragraph of the Rejoinder Affidavit is as under;
“41. CONCLUDING PARAGRAPH
41.1. From the material available on record and legal position settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Court including this Hon’ble Court, it is clear that the notifications and orders passed by the Respondent No. 1 are against the law and the policy decided by the Central Government.
The impugned orders are not based on sound materials or logics but actuated by the ulterior purposes.
41.2. The mandates are unlawful, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and therefore liable to quashed and set aside with a cost of Rs. 5 Crores as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
41.3. The petitioner and the citizens needs to be compensated as per Section 2 of Epidemic Act, 1897 by the State, for the losses incurred by each citizen due to unlawful mandates of the State.
41.4. The Respondent No. 1 has not only passed the unlawful orders but also made false and misleading submissions on affidavit before this Hon’ble Court with ulterior purposes. Therefore they are liable to be prosecuted and punished under Section 52, 191, 192, 193, 199, 200, 201, 202, 218, 471, 474 r/w 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of IPC and hence appropriate direction is required to be given to the Registrar of the High Court to file complaint as per procedure laid down under Section 340 of the Cr. P.C. OR an enquiry through C.B.I. can be ordered as done inSarvepalli Radhakrishnan Vs. Union of India (2019) 14 SCC 761, Afzal and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. (1996) 7 SCC 397, ABCD Vs. Union of India (2020) 2 SCC 52.
41.5. Respondent No. 1 Shri.Debashish Chakraborty &Dr. Sadhna Tayde are also liable for action and punishment under Section 2(c) & 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for filing false affidavit before this Hon’ble Court, as per law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ABCD Vs. Union of India (2020) 2 SCC 52.
41.6. That the act of Respondent No. 1 & its authorities in deliberately not following the scientific data and suggestions by the experts like Dr. Sanjay Rai of AIIMS New Delhi, regarding not vaccinating the persons with antibodies due to natural immunity is ex-facie having an impact of wastage & misappropriation thousands of crores of public money with giving wrongful profit to vaccine companies and wrongful loss to common man. Therefore the Respondent No. 1 Shri. Debashish Chakraborty, Respondent No. 10 Shri. Uddhav Thackrey and all others involved in the conspiracy, who directly or indirectly supported the unlawful acts and helped in facilitation of the crime needs to be prosecuted under Section 52, 409, 120(B), 109 & 34 etc. of IPC and for any other offences by which they are responsible for death or side effects caused to innocent persons.
41.7. Since the Order/SOP/Notifications issued by the Respondent No. 1 Debashish Chakraborty & others were against the law and policy decisions of the National Authority, therefore all the responsible officers are liable to be prosecuted under Section 51(b), 55 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005r/w Section 52, 166, 188, 120(B), 34, 109, 341, 342, 220 etc. of IPC.
41.8. Since Respondent No. 10 Shri Uddhav Thackrey, Chairman of State Disaster Management Authority, and Chief Minister of Maharastra is accused and complicit to the offence, therefore the investigation has to be done the C.B.I. as per law laid down in Dr.JaishriLaxmanraoPatilVs. State of Maharashtra 2021 SCC OnLineBom 516.
41.9. Appropriate action is required under section 2(b), (c) and 12 of Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 against the editorial board of Dainik Samna, web portal Live Law and other media persons involved in spreading one-sided, twisted and bias news about the present case or any other similar issues with ulterior motive to create prejudice amongst the public, witnesses and litigants.
41.10. Directions to all media persons to act as per law laid down in NileshNavalakha Vs. UOI 2021 SCC OnLineBom 56 and to publish the news regarding this case or covid-19 treatment in a fair and transparent manner by quoting the views of both the sides and not to spread fear but to remove fear and to help in creating a healthy atmosphere.”
8. The summary of submissions in the Rejoinder Affidavit are as under;
40. SUMMARY OF SUBMISSION:
40.1. The impugned notification dated 10.08.2021 and the subsequent notifications including recent notification dated 27.11.2021 which made classification between the vaccinated and unvaccinated people is not based on any scientific evidence or any logical reasoning admissible under law.
40.2. The notifications are against the policy decisions of Central Government. The Central Government in their affidavits filed before Hon’ble Supreme Court and in their reply under RTI and in the answer by Minister before Lok Sabha made it clear that there cannot be any discrimination on the basis of vaccination status of a person and no benefits or services can be denied to a person who has not taken the vaccines,
40.3. As per section 38 (a) 39 (1) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the state Government cannot frame any policies against the policy framed by the National Authority. And as per section 76 the National Authority has to decide the policy as per approvals of the Central Government. Therefore, the notification and order passed by Respondent No.1 which are against the policies of the Central Government are illegal.
40.4. The data given by the Respondent No. 1 itself makes it clear that the vaccinated people are neither protected from Covid-19 infection nor other people are safe from the spread of infection by the vaccinated people. The vaccinated people are also asked to follow the Covid Appropriate Behavior (CAB).
40.5. The another reasoning given by the Respondent No. 1 is about reduction in hospitalization, is not based on any data showing the number and percentage of hospitalization of Covid patients amongst vaccinated and unvaccinated. Even otherwise said submissions are proven to be false from the data given by the petitioner.
The data available in the public domain and relied by the petitioner is not disputed by the Respondent No. 1 therefore, prima facie it has to be accepted as true in allowing the petition as per law laid down by the Full Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI (1986) 1 SCC 133, Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. UOI 2021 SCC OnLine SC 985.
40.6. Even otherwise hypothetical the fear of future hospitalization cannot be ground to discriminate the people and stop them from doing their daily work.
40.7. As per reply given by the Union of India and the scientific research available, the sting operation carried out by the main stream media news paper Mid-Day, makes it clear that the mask mandates are unscientific and providing no protection to healthy people but causing harm to the body and decreasing the oxygen level in them.
The mask mandates are brought by the State (Respondent No. 1) to extort money from common people and the state authorities themselves are not following these rules as exposed from the wedding of daughter of Member of Parliament Shri Sanjay Raut.
40.8. The reasoning given by the state for discrimination has no logic nor having any link with their orders.
Hence said order does not pass the scrutiny of the Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India as laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Court and therefore has to be declared as ultra-virus and need to be quashed forthwith.
40.9. State Authority (Respondent No. 1) acted in violation of section 2 of Epidemic Diseases Act,1897 and section 12 and 13 of Disaster Management Act, 2005 while passing orders to prohibit movements of unvaccinated people but not providing them compensation of the losses incurred by them.
40.10. Several applications for granting compensation are not even replied by the Government. This shows the double standard of the Government.
40.11. The state before this Hon’ble Court instead of being fair and transparent in the matter concerning crores of citizens, have acted in bad faith and is contesting the petition like adversial litigation. The dishonesty is writ large as can be seen from the very fact that despite the court’s order that the matter is serious and concerning fundamental rights of the citizen, the State Authority did not file the proper reply nor placed the correct and complete data before the Court.
State’s action is in Contempt of the Supreme Court & High Court guidelines in Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. UOI 2021 SCC OnLine SC 985, Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. UOI (1986) 1 SCC 133, Seethalakshmi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu 1989 SCC OnLine Mad 272, Amardeepsingh Thakur Vs. Deputy Inspector General 2020 SCC OnLineBom 6621.
40.12. The reply affidavit is false & misleading and prepared with suppression, twisting and dishonest concealment of facts.
40.13. No reasoning is given by the state authorities to the specific ground taken by the Petitioner that as to why, the safest person, who had previous infection of Covid-19 and those have developed antibodies are being forced to take vaccines which is giving no benefit to them but causing harm to their bodies and causing loss to the tune of thousands of crores of public money. As per their own survey, there are more than 85% Citizen having developed antibodies.
40.13.1. Hence, the decision taken and order passed by the Respondent No.1 by ignoring this crucial data vitiates the order and lead to only one conclusion that the authorities passed the order by practising ‘Fraud on Power’ as per law laid down in Vijay Shekhar Vs. UOI (2004) 4 SCC 666 & Harshit Agarwal Vs. UOI (2021) 2 SCC 710.
40.13.2. This is a sufficient ground to draw an inference of malafides of the state authority and to order investigation through C.B.I. as ruled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Noida Entrepreneurs Association Vs. Noida (2011) 6 SCC 508.
40.14. The Respondent No. 1 Chief Secretary Shri. Debashish Chakrabarty has not taken two doses but then too he is attending the Government office and has affirmed the affidavit from his office. Thismake it clear that the rules are not followed by the state authority itself. Which further means that the state officials are aware that non-compliance to their illogical, unscientific and unlawful rules will cause no threat to themselves or to the public.
Hence their opposition to the petition is unjustified and actuated with malice, ill-will, ulterior motive and malafide intention.
40.15. Government Pleaders and Senior Counsel representing the State of Maharashtra were duty bound to prepare draft and place full facts and documentary evidence before the Court even if they are against their clients. And to make lawful submissions and should not place reliance on twisted and suppressed data and per-incuriam, irrelevant judgments, as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court in Shiv Kumar Vs. Hukam Chand (1999) 7 SCC 467(F.B), E. S. Reddi Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of A.P (1987) 3 SCC 258, Lal Bahadur Gautam Vs. State (2019) 6 SCC 441, Heena Nikhil Dharia Vs. KokilabenKirtikumarNayak and Ors. 2016 SCCOnLineBom 9859, State of Orissa Vs. Nalinikanta Muduli (2004) 7 SCC 19.
40.15.1. But Government Pleader and Sr. Counsel did not perform their duty as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court.
40.15.2. In fact, they took technical objection on incorrect facts.
40.16. The impugned orders passed by the State authorities and Respondent No. 1 are only executive orders. They are not placed before both the Houses of State Legislature as mandated under Section 78 (3) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
40.16.1. As per Article 19, 21 of the Constitution of India the curtailment of fundamental rights cannot be on the basis of executive orders but should be by a law enacted by the Parliament. Such orders need to be quashed. [Re. Dinthar Incident Vs. State of Mizoram 2021 SCC OnLineGau 1313].
40.17. The impugned orders are against the policy decisions of National Authority under Disaster Management Act, 2005 and the Central Government and it is in violation of Section 38(a) & 39(1) of the Act and therefore it is ultra-vires, null,void& vitiated.
As per Section 76 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 the regulations should be made with the prior approval of the Central Government. Hence, the impugned notifications and orders are unlawful and made in breach of the guidelines by the Central Government.
40.17.1. It is an offence under Section 166, 188, 341, 342, 220, 409, 120(B), 34 etc.of IPC on the part of Respondent No. 1 Chief Secretary and others who are directly and indirectly involved in the conspiracy.
40.18. The impugned notifications are also illegal as they are passed without taking approval from the National Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (NPDRR). Therefore, impugned notifications are illegal for violation of Rule 3 of Notification No. 47-31/2012-DM-111 dated 05.07.2017.
40.19. The data shows that hospitalization, infection amongst vaccinated is higher than the unvaccinated.
40.20. State did not perform their duty of publishing fatal side effects of vaccines and are forcing the people to take vaccines. The informed consent of the citizens is obtained either by deception or by force, which is contempt of law laid down in Common Cause Vs. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1, Montgomery’ s Case  UKSC 11 etc. It is violation of Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 2005.
40.21. The petitioner was compelled to take vaccine and therefore State is bound to compensate all victim citizen and the petitioner in view of law laid down in Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130.
40.22. Respondent No 10 Shri Uddhav Thackery by his act of commission and omission is liable to be prosecuted along with the Respondent No.1 Shri Debashish Chakraborty &Ors. as per section 120(B), 34,109 of IPC.
40.23. The media persons involved in the conspiracy committed contempt of judgment in the case of NileshNavalakha Vs. UOI 2021 SCC OnLineBom 56 by publishing one sided news with ulterior motive to misled and confuse the public and witnesses and thereby to prejudice the cause.
40.23. The media persons and more particularly the editorial board of Marathi Daily Samna, which is owned by wife of Respondent No.10 and web portal Live Law are also liable to be prosecuted in view provisions of the section 10 of Evidence Act and section 120 (B) & 34 of IPC.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi added as a party Respondent by the High Court of Bombay and askedto assist High Court in deciding the illegality of circulars issued by Maharashtra Government on vaccine mandates
In a big development in a PIL filed before Bombay High Court challenging the arbitrary vaccine mandates of the State Government, the Counsel for Petitioner has sent a notice to Respondent No. 8Shri. Narendra Modi, calling upon him to authorize a person to assist the High Court in deciding the Petition on merits.
Maharashtra Government’s game is over nowas they cannot formulate any rule against the National Authority and that the National Authority is against any restriction on unvaccinated.
The Division Bench of Bombay High Courthas accepted the request of Adv. Nilesh Ojha representing the Petitioner, to add the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) as a Respondent.
Prime Minister Shri. Narendra Modi is the Chairman of the NDMA. Courthas asked NDMA to help the Court in deciding the petition on merits.
The Court’s order dated 22.12.2021 reads thus;
“2. List the PIL petitions ‘First on Board’ on January 3, 2022.
3.On the oral prayer of the learned advocates for the petitioners, National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) is impleaded as a Respondent in the PIL petitions. Service be effected on the NDMA with an intimation of the next date.
4.We are conscious of the fact that although no relief has been claimed against it, the presence of the NDMA could be of assistance for us to decide the PIL petitions finally on merits.”
This issue came before the Court due to the submission in an additional Affidavit filed by the Petitioner Shri. Yohan Tengra that the State is putting restrictions against the policy decisions of Central Government, which is not permissible as per Section 38(1) & 39(a) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
The State and District Authority who are taking contrary standare liable for punishment under Section 51(b), 55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005 and Section 166, 120(B), 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code.
In support of the submission, the counsel for the Petitioner has relied upon the Affidavits filed by the Union of India before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
In the Affidavit filed before the Bombay High Court, Bench of Goa in W. P. No. 1820 of 2021 on dated 08.10.2021, it is a clear stand of Government of India and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare that,COVID-19 vaccination is completely voluntary for all citizens of India. Government of India has not formulated or suggested any policies for discrimination between citizens of India on the basis of their vaccination status.
Excerpts from the relevant paragraphs are as under;
“9. That, it is further humbly submitted that the directions and guidelines released by Government of India and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, do not entail compulsory or forcible vaccination against COVID-19 disease implying that COVID-19 vaccination is completely voluntary for all citizens of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India has not formulated or suggested any policies for discrimination between citizens of India on the basis of their vaccination status.
10.That, it is duly advised, advertised and communicated by MoHFW through various print and social media platforms that all citizens should get vaccinated, but this in no way implies that any person can be forced to be vaccinated against her / his wishes.”
On 28 November, 2021 in a Counter Affidavit filed before Hon’ble Supreme Court by Dr. P.B.N. Prasad, working as Joint Drugs Controller (India), Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, it is once again reiterated that vaccination is not linked to any benefits or services.
The Petitioner also relied on the judgment in Madan Mili’s2021 SCC OnLineGau 1503,case where policy decision of Union of India declared in Lok Sabha was also taken into consideration as under;
“3. The Petitioner contends that as per the RTI Information furnished by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, which is available on the website of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Covid-19 vaccination is not mandatory but voluntary. A copy of the RTI Information available in the website of the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, has been annexed by the petitioner as Annexure 3 to the petition. The petitioner also refers to an answer given on 19.03.2021 in the Lok Sabha to an Unstarred Question No. 3976 by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India (Annexure 4 to the petition) stating that there is no provision of compensation for recipients of Covid-19 Vaccination against any kind of side effects or medical complication that may arise due to inoculation. The Covid-19 Vaccination is entirely voluntary for the beneficiaries.”
The Counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra submitted that, the stand of Union of India cannot be said to be the stand of National Authority under Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Therefore, Counsel for Petitioner requested the Court to add the National Authority as Respondent and to clear their stand so as to decide the issue, once and for all.
The Courthas accepted the request and added NDMA as a party Respondent.
The Counsel for Petitioner has sent a Notice to Respondent No. 8 – Shri. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister and Chairman of NDMA to appoint any officer to represent before the Bombay High Court and make the stand clear including prosecution of Chief Secretary and other officers of Maharashtra who are involved in bringing unlawful mandates and violating fundamental rights of the citizen.
Excerpts from the Notice to Prime Minister:-
“1.That, in the above said background, the next submission of the Counsel for the Petitioner was that in view of Section 38(1) & 39(a) of Disaster Management Act, 2005; the State or District Authorities cannot bring any rules or pass any orders which are contrary to the policy decision of the National Authority.
2.However, the Hon’ble High Court put a query seeking clarification, as to, if any specific order is passed by the National Authority stating that no force or coercion in vaccination.
3.The submission of the Counsel for the Petitioner is that, the policy decision of Union of India’s Heath Ministry in their Affidavits before the Bombay High Court&the Supreme Court and the policy decision of the Union of India, as answered in Lok Sabha, is the stand of National Disaster Management Authority and they are not having any contrary stand on it. Because Hon’ble Prime Minister of India himself is the Chairman of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA).
4.In this regard, already a Notice is served by us, upon the Advocate for Union of India, on 20.12.2021 requesting them to throw light on the controversy. Thereafter, on 22.12.2021, as per the request of counsel for Petitioner, the National Disaster Management Authority is added as a party Respondent.
5.Hence, you are requested to forthwith get explanation from the concerned department and provide us a Written Reply at the earliest through person appointed for representing the case before Hon’ble High Court.
6.That, recently the Health Ministry of Japan has made following declaration/orders on their website:
“Consent to vaccination
Although we encourage all citizens to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, it is not compulsory or mandatory. Vaccination will be given only with the consent of the person to be vaccinated after the information provided. Please get vaccinated of your own decision, understanding both the effectiveness in preventing infectious diseases and the risk of side effects. No vaccination will be given without consent. Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be vaccinated, and do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated.”
7.Furthermore, the Government of Japan also asked the citizens to make complaints to Human Rights Division, if there is any discrimination on the basis of vaccination status.
8.That the above declaration is mandatory to all countries across the world because of Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 2005 and also as per law laid down inMontgomery’s case  UKSC 11,Airdale NHS Trust v/s. Bland (1993) 1 All ER 821, Common Cause v/s. Union of India (2018) 5SCC 1, Registrar General v/s. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130.
9. Needless to mention here that, in a recent case of vaccine injury, the Government of Singapore granted a compensation of Rs. 1 Crore 78 Lakhs to the victim, as the vaccine caused increase in heart beats.
10.That, in the case of side effects of vaccines, the United States’ Government has set up the ‘National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’. In the case of side effects of MMR vaccines the Court granted a settlement of 101 Million U.S. Dollars (Rupees 7,50,34,31,400 Crores).
11.That, in another case related with misrepresentation by pharma companies, by suppressing the side effects of medicines. The companies’ failure to report certain safety data was also taken into consideration. The investigating agency of the US, on their own, investigated and recovered an amount 10.2 Billion US Dollars (Approx. Rupees76,464 Crores.)
12.The Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Courtin the case of Anita Kushwaha v/s. Pushap Sadan (2016)8SCC509, hasruled that,the life of Indian Citizen is not less pricy than the life of people in England or anywhere. But in India the rights are more precious. It is ruled that;
“18…Bose,J.emphasized the importance of the right of any person to apply to the Court and demand that he be dealt with according to law. Hesaid: (Prabhakar Kesheocase [Prabhakar Kesheo Tare v. Emperor, AIR 1943 Nag 26: 1942 SCC OnLine MP 78],SCCOnLine MPpara1)
“1. … The right is prized in India no less highly than in England, or indeed any other part of the Empire, perhapseven more highly here than elsewhere; and it is zealouslyguarded by the Courts.”
13.That as pointed out during the hearing of the case, the WHO has warned the people getting CoviShield (AstraZeneca) vaccines to be careful as it is causing a serious paralytic disease GBS (Guillain Barre Syndrome).
16.That, your good-self are requested to point out the concerned officials that, as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the case of State of Odisha v/s. PartimaMohanty 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1222, the public servant, more particularly from the office of Health Ministry, if failed to take an action as expected then he/she will be liable for prosecution under section 218, 201, 202, 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of Indian Penal Code.
17.Hence, you are requested to do the needful as per the preceding paras of the notice and more particularly to:
(a) Clarify the stand of National Disaster Management Authority, regarding policies of discriminating citizen on the basis of their vaccination status;
(b) Course of action taken or being taken under section 51(b) & 55 of National Disaster Management Act, 2005 against State Authorities including District Collectors who are acting contrary to the policy decisions and directives of National Disaster Management Authority.
(c) Direction to Ministry of Health &Family Welfare to update their website and give the correct and proper information about the side effects of vaccines which is mandatory as per Good Clinical Practices of ‘informed consent’ laid down under Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and also as per Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 2005 and law laid down in Montgomery’s case  UKSC 11.”
The Bombay High Court will hear this matter next on January 3, 2022.
MULTIPLE PETITIONS FILED IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE VACCINE MANDATES OF STATE GOVERNMENTS.
The Central Government in its affidavit before the Supreme Court has supported the cause of Petitioner that vaccination cannot be forced and that no service or benefits shall be denied for not taking vaccines.
29 Petitions from all states are filed in the Supreme Court to stop unlawful vaccine & mask mandate.
Notice served to Chief Secretary of Maharashtra & District Collectors to forthwith stop unlawful mask & vaccine rules as matter is sub judice before the Supreme Court.
Debashish Chakraborty – Chief Secretary of Maharashtra,Mr. Iqbal Chahal – BMC Commissioner, Mr. Suresh Kakani – BMC Additional Commissioner, Mr. Sunil Chavan – Aurangabad District Collector and others are made Party Respondent.
Supreme Court to hear the petitions on December 13, 2021.
Around 500 lawyers are going to represent the petitioners.
Many advocates/associates including Indian Bar Association have extended their support to the cause raised by the petitioner that no one can be forced to get vaccines and wear masks. No services and benefits can be linked to the vaccination status of a person. Many courts across the world including the U.S. courts and various High Courts in India have quashed or stayed such illegal mandates.
As per the law clarified by the Full Bench of Supreme Court in Abdul Karim vs. M. K. Prakash , AIR 1976 SC 859,if any order is sub judice before Supreme Court and Court is seized of the matter and even if no stay is granted,even then, the authorities should stay their hands away and wait for the final adjudication by the court, else the concerned authority will be liable for punishment of six months imprisonment under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
The Supreme Court had sentenced Maharashtra’s Chief Secretary Ashok Khot and Minister Saroop singh Naik under contempt and sent them to jail for one month.
No immunity to vaccine companies – Central Government tells Supreme Court in its affidavit before the Supreme Court.
It is a major setback to the toxic philanthropist and vaccine mafia’s Kingpin Bill Gates and his partner Adar Poonawalla, and other co-accused who have been prosecuted for mass murders through vaccines.They are also charged for offences of cheating public at large with false narratives and conspiracy theories.
In a recent petition filed before Bombay High Court Writ Petition (ST) No. 18017 of 2021,the mother of deceased has made following prayers;
“PRAYERS: It is therefore humbly prayed for;
i) B.I. be directed to treat this petition as F.I.R. and prosecute the offender as done by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Noida Entrepreneurs Association Vs. Noida (2011) 6 SCC 508and followed by this Hon’ble Court in the matter between ParamBir Singh v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLineBom 516.
ii) B.I. be further directed to immediately start custodial interrogation of the accused and take use of scientific tests like Lie Detector Test, Brain Mapping Test and Narco Analysis Test to unearth the complete conspiracy and to save the life of Indian Citizen;
iii)Direction to Respondent No. 1 i.e. State of Maharashtra to pay an interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores to the Petitioner forthwith and then to recover it from the guilty officials responsible for death of the Petitioners citizen by their deliberate and unlawful act of commission and omission.
iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
The Central Government in its affidavit dated 29th Nov 2021 filed before Supreme Court of India in a petition filed by Dr.JacobPuliyel vs. Union of India Writ Petition (C) No. 607 of 2021,had made it clear that the Government has not granted any protection / immunity from prosecution to the vaccine companies.
The relevant para 65 reads thus;
“VIII.INDEMNIFICATION OF VACCINE MANUFACTURERS
65. No indemnity has been granted and the current legal regime under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 and Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 does not contain any such provisions.”
Download Related Documents :-
A copy of petition filed by Smt. KiranYadav can be downloaded here;
Affidavit filed by Central Government in Supreme Court on November 29, 2021 has overruled the order passed by Mr. Sitaram Kunte, Chief Secretary of Maharashtra Government, on November 28, 2021
The affidavit has made it clear that the orders, GR, SOPs issued by Maharashtra, Tamilnadu, Kerala and any other state government, District Collector about vaccine mandates are illegal.
Supreme Court has asked the petitioner to add all the states who are issuing such mandates, as party Respondentin the case.
Central Government has once again made it clear that vaccines are not mandatory and it is not connected with any benefit any services. The affidavit filed by Central Government before Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter between Dr. Jacob Puliyel Vs. Union of India Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 Of 2021 is loud proof that Maharashtra and other governments are acting illegally.
In the Counter Affidavit filed by Dr. P.B.N. Prasad, working as Joint Drugs Controller (India), Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India on 28th November 2021, the relevant Paragraph 64 reads as under;
“64. In so far as the Petitioner’s submissions regarding Covid 19 vaccine being mandatory, as per the Operational Guidelines document, COVID-19 vaccination is voluntary. However, it is emphasised and encouraged that all individuals take vaccination for public health and in his/ her interest as well as public interest since in case of pandemic, an individual’s ill health has a direct effect on the society. Covid-19 vaccination is also not linked to any benefits or services. Therefore, any submissions made by the Petitioner to the contrary, in so far as the Answering Respondents are concerned, is denied.”
World’s First Vaccine Murder case against Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla filed in India’s High Court
World’s First Vaccine Murder case against Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla filed in India’s High Court. [Kiran Yadav Vs. State and ors.Criminal Writ Petition (St.) 18017 of 2021]
Petitioner has sought prosecution of AstraZeneca’s (Covishield) manufacturer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawalla and other Government officials and leaders involved in the murder of a 23 year old man, who lost his life because of vaccination. The deceased took the Covishield vaccine by believing in the false narrative that the vaccine is completely safe and also owing to the compliance requirement set by the Railways that only double vaccinated people would be allowed to travel.
The Government of India’s AEFI (Adverse Event Following Immunisation) Committee has recently admitted that the death of Dr.SnehalLunawat,was due to side effects of the Covishield vaccine. The said report has exposed the falsity of the claim made by vaccine syndicatethat vaccines are totally safe.
Petitioner has claimed Rs. 1000 crores ($ 134 million USD) compensation and has asked for interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores ($ 13.4 million USD).
Petitioner has also sought Lie Detector, Narco Analysis Test of accused Bill Gates and others.
In a case before the American Court regarding the side effects of MR vaccines, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars (around Rs. 752 Crores) to the victim.
In another case in America, the CIA, FDA’s office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar (around Rs.76,00 crores) from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the life of Americans in danger.
The company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices.
The United States further alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.
Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug.
The missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack).
It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs.
Constitution Bench of Supreme Court of India in Anita Kushwaha’s case (2016) 8 SCC 509,made it clear that the rights of Indians are no lesser than the people across the world.
In India lakhs of compensation claims are expected to be filed soon.
The judgment in Montgomery’s case  UKSC 11, Airdale NHS Trust Vs. Bland (1993) 1 All ER 821, Common Cause Vs. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1 and Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130 and also the Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 2005, makes it clear that before giving vaccine or any treatment to a person, he should be informed about the side effects of the medicine and also about the alternate remedies available.
If any person is vaccinated by suppressing the facts or by telling a lie that the said vaccines are completely safe, amount to the consent being obtained under deception. In India, vaccination under deception or by force/coercion or by putting certain stiflingconditions, is a civil and criminal wrong. [Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130]
Based on the abovesaid legal position the petitioner asked for registration of an F.I.R. under Section 52, 115, 302, 409, 120(B), 420, 34, 109etc. of IPC and section 51(b), 55 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 against concerned officials who were marketing the vaccines as completely safe.
Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, the partners in manufacturing the Covishield (AstraZeneca) vaccine are made accused for their involvement in conspiracy.
In India, the person allowing the false marketing of his product is also held to be guilty due to his act of commission and omission. In this regard the provisions of Section 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of IPC get attracted to make Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla guilty of mass murders i.e. Section 302, 115, etc. of IPC.
The prayers in the petition read thus;
“i)C.B.I. be directed to treat this petition as F.I.R. and prosecute the offender as done by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Noida Entrepreneurs Association Vs. Noida (2011) 6 SCC 508and followed by this Hon’ble Court in the matter between Param Bir Singh v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLineBom 516.
ii)B.I. be further directed to immediately start custodial interrogation of the accused and take use of scientific tests like Lie Detector Test, Brain Mapping Test and Narco Analysis Test to unearth the complete conspiracy and to save the life of Indian Citizen;
iii)Direction to Respondent No. 1 i.e. State of Maharashtra to pay an interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores to the Petitioner forthwith and then to recover it from the guilty officials responsible for death of the Petitioners citizen by their deliberate and unlawful act of commission and omission.”
As per the expert opinion, considering the proofs of sterling nature, Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla will get death penalty.
The Petitioner also relied upon the criminal antecedents of Bill Gates in killing 8 female children by unauthorized trial of HPV vaccines in India and judgment of Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Kalpana Mehta’s Case (2018) 7 SCC 1, which is a strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate.
Petitioner has also referred to the proofs of sinister plan of Bill Gates in polio programme which spoiled the lives of 4.5 lakh children in India as they suffered new type of paralysis. This is also an additional proof of Bill Gates’ pervert and criminal mindset.
As per experts, there is no chance of Bill Gates getting bail in the case and all the movable and immovable properties of the accused will be confiscated soon.
Various social organizations and common people have decided to exercise citizen’s right to arrest the accused as provided under section 43 of Cr.P.C. As per the said section, any citizen can arrest Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla and other accused and handover them to the police.
Recently in Australia around 10,000 compensation claims are filed against the vaccine injury.
भा.द.वि. की धारा 153-A, 505 (2), 166, 409, 120(B), 34, 109 तथा आपत्ती निवारण कानून, 2005 की धारा 51(b), 54, 55 के तहत मेयर नरेश म्हस्के और इस गुनाह में उनका साथ देनेवालों पर होगी कारवाई.
नईदिल्ली:- केंद्र सरकार ने अपने लिखीत जवाब में, लोकसभा में और उच्च न्यायालय में दायर शपथ पत्र में बार-बार स्पष्ट किया है की टीका लेने वाले और नही लेने वालों में कोई भी भेदभाव नही किया जा सकता।
मा. उच्च न्यायालय ने In Re: Dinthar 2021 SCC OnLine Gau 1313 मामले में भी स्पष्ट किया की टीका लेनेवाले लोग भी कोरोना का शिकार हो सकते हैं और वो भी टीका नही लेनेवालों की तरह ही महामारी फैला सकते हैं।दोनों में कोई फर्क नही है। इसलिए उनमें किसी भी प्रकार का भेदभाव नही किया जा सकता।
दुनिया भर के विश्वविख्यात विशेषज्ञों और AIIMS के डॉ. संजीव राय ने भी कहा है कि दुनिया में सबसे सुरक्षित लोग वे है जिन्हें एक बार कोरोना होकर गया है या कोव्हीड विषाणु के संपर्क में आने की वजह से जिनके शरीर में प्रतिकार शक्ति (Natural Immunity) तैयार हो गई है उन लोगों को दुबारा कोरोना नहीं हो सकता और वे लोग किसी और को रोग नहीं फैला सकते।
लेकिन टीका कंपनियों को हजारों करोड़ का मुनाफा पहुंचाने के लिए (कुछ भ्रष्ट नेता, अधिकारियों द्वारा) झूठे नॅरेटीव्ह, अफवाये और गैरकानूनी तरीके अपनाकर कैसे भी करके सभी नागरिकों को टीका देने का षड्यंत्र चल रहा है
ऐसे कई गैरकानूनी आदेश उच्च न्यायालय ने खारिज (Quash) कर दिए हैं। खुद महाराष्ट्र के स्वास्थ्य मंत्री राजेश टोपे ने भी ऐसे गैरकानूनी नियम बनाने वाले महाराष्ट्र सरकार के मुख्य सचिव और औरंगाबाद के जिला अधिकारी को पहला फटकार लगाई है।
लेकिन कुछ लोगों को अब भी अकल नहीं आयी है और वे अपनी हरकतों से बाज नहीं आ रहे हैं। ठाणे के महापौर नरेश म्हस्के ने 15 नवंबर को टीका लेने की जबरदस्ती करने के लिए लोकल बस में टीका नहीं लेनेवालो को प्रवेश नहीं देना, महापालिका कर्मचारियों का वेतन रोकना ऐसे गैरकानूनी आदेश पारित किये। इसके साथ ही उन्होंन ‘लोकमतन्यूज़ 18′ टीव्ही चॅनल को दिये अपने इंटरव्हयू में झूठ कहा कि टीका नहीं लेनेवालो द्वारा कोरोना का फैलाव होने का खतरा रहता है मतलब केवल टीका लेनेवाले लोग ही सुरक्षित है उनका झूठ खुद सरकार के जवाब से ही साबित हो गया। उनकी टिप्पणी झूठी होने के अलावा, दो गुटों में वैमनस्य फैलाने वाली भी है इसलिए उनके खिलाफ भादवि153-A, 505(2), 166, 409,120(B),34,109आदि धाराओं में तथा आपत्तीनिवारणकानून,2005 की धारा 51(b),54,55 के तहत कारवाई की शिकायत की गई है ऐसी शिकायतें देशभर की विभिन्न अदालतों में दायर की जाने वाली है इसके अलावा मानव अधिकार सुरक्षा परिषद के महासचिव रशीद खान पठान ने भी नरेश म्हस्के को 50 करोड़ रुपये मुआवजे का कानूनी नोटीस भेजा है।
इंडियन बार असोसिएशन की लीगल सेल प्रमुख ॲड. दिपाली ओझा ने केन्द्र के गृह सचिव अजय भल्ला के पास शिकायत दर्ज कर नरेश म्हस्के और अन्य आरोपीयों के खिलाफ तुरंत एफ. आय. आर. दर्ज करने की मांग की है।
आपत्तीनिवारणकानून, 2005कीधारा 38(1),39(a) के तहत किसी भी जिला प्रशासन या राज्य सरकार को केन्द्र के निर्देशों के खिलाफ जाकर नियम बनाने का अधिकार नहीं है। ऐसे अधिकारीयों को सजा के लिए धारा 51(b), 55 मे स्पष्ट प्रावधान है।
इसके पहले भी केन्द्रीय गृह सचिव अजय भल्ला ने केन्द्र के दिशा निर्देशों के खिलाफ काम कर राज्य में यातायात के लिए ‘ई–पास’ की सक्ती करनेवाले नियम बनाने की वजह से जिला प्रशासन एवंम राज्य के मुख्य सचिव को पत्र लिख कर गैरकानूनी नियम तुरंत हटाने की बात कही थी। उसके बाद सभी राज्यों में तुरंत ही सभी गैरकानूनी आदेश वापस ले लिए थे।
महाराष्ट्र के औरंगाबाद की 32 वर्षीय डॉ. स्नेहल लुणावत की मौत ‘कोव्हीशील्डटीका’(Covishield Vaccine) से होने की बात को सरकार की AEFI समीती ने माना है।
कोरोना के ‘कोवीशिल्ड’ या अन्य टीका (vaccine) लेने की वजह से होने वाली मौतें और जानलेवा दुष्परिणामों की बढ़ती तादाद के मद्देनजर ‘विश्वस्वास्थ्यसंगठन‘ (WHO) ने लोगों से अपील की है कि ‘कोवीशिल्ड’ टीका लेने वालों को Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) नामक बीमारी का खतरा है और टीका लेने वाले लोग सावधानी बरतें।
‘कोवीशिल्ड’(Astrazeneca) टीका लेने से खून की गुठलीया होकर बच्चों और युवाओं की मौत होने के मामले बढ़ने की वजह से 16 यूरोपियन देशों ने मार्च 2021 में कोवीशिल्ड (Astrazeneca) पर रोक लगा दी थी।
कॅनडा के सरकारी आरोग्य विभाग ने कोवीशिल्ड (AstraZeneca) टीके से Autoimmune Disorder के रक्त संबंधी गंभीर जानलेवा दुष्परीणामों के प्रति जनता को आगाह किया है:
कोरोना का टीका लेने वाले लोगों में दिल का दौरा पड़ने से असमय मौत के मामले सामने आए हैं।
ऐसे ही एक मामले में वसई के 23 वर्षीय युवक श्री हितेश कड़वे की मौत ‘कोव्हीशील्ड’ का टीका लेने की वजह से दिल का दौरा पड़ने से हुई है और उसकी माँ ने ‘इंडियनबारअसोसिएशन’ और ‘अवेकनइंडियामूवमेंट’ की मदद से दोषी डॉक्टर्स और सरकारी अधिकारियों के खिलाफ हत्या झूठा प्रचार कर धोखे से टीका देना, सरकारी पैसा और संसाधनों का दुरुपयोग टीका कंपनियों को हजारों करोड़ रुपए का गैरकानूनी फायदा पहुंचाने के लिए करना आदि गुनाहों के लिए IPC 302, 420, 409,120(B) , 34 आदि धाराओं के तहत शिकायत दर्ज की है।
अक्टूबर 2021 को स्वीडन, डेनमार्क फिनलैंड आदि यूरोपियन देशों ने टीका लेने की वजह से युवाओं में दिल के संबंधित गंभीर बीमारियां (Cardiovascular) होने की बात को गंभीरता से लेते हुए युवाओं को वह टिका देने पर पाबंदी लगा दी।
भारत देश में कोरोना टीका (vaccine) की वजह से होने वाली मौतें और उसके दुष्परिणामों की सही जांच करने का कोई कारगर सिस्टम ही नहीं है।इस बारे में वरिष्ठ वायरोलॉजिस्ट श्री. जैकब जॉन ने टाइम्स ऑफ इंडिया में अपना चिंता जाहिर की है।
अब तक मीडिया में प्रकाशीत रिपोर्ट के आधार पर यह पाया गया की टीके के दुष्परिणामों की वजह से होने वाली तकरीबन 4900 मौतें हो चुकी है।वास्तव में यह संख्या बहुत ज्यादा है क्योंकि अधिकारी दिल का दौरा आदी मौतों को इसमें नही जोड़ रहे है। यह सिर्फ टीका कंपनियों के फायदे के लिए किया जा रहा है ।
इन सभी बातों से यह बात साफ है कि हम सभी को झूठ बोलकर, धोखे से, दबाव बनाकर कोरोना का टीका दिया गया या लेने पर मजबूर किया गया है और किया जा रहा है ।
इस वजह से सरकार हर टीका लेने वालों को जिन्हे आज कोई भी दुष्परिणाम भले ही ना दिख रहा है उन सभी को पूरी जानकारी ना देकर धोखे से टीका देने के गुनाह के लिए मुआवजा (हर्जाना) यानी (Compensation) देने के लिए बाध्य है। इस बारे में स्पष्ट कानून मा. उच्च न्यायालयने बनाया है:-
[Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLine Megh 130]
“7……Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with their body’. Thus, by use of force or through deception if an unwilling capable adult is made to have the ‘flu vaccine would be considered both a crime and tort or civil’ wrong”
Complaint filed against Thane’s (Maharashtra) Mayor Shri. Naresh Mhaske for his false, derogatory remarks against unvaccinated people
He is charged for offences under section 153-A, 505(2), 409, 52, 120(B), 34, 109, 166, 167 of IPC and section 51(b), 54, 55 of Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Secretary General of Human Rights Security Council sends notice asking compensation of Rs. 50 crores.
Many cases are likely to be filed against Shri. Naresh Mhaske and News channels in various courts across the country.
New Delhi: Thane Municipal Corporation’s Mayor Shri. Naresh Mhaske is in great trouble for his offensiveremark and false statement against the unvaccinated people.
A complaint is filed by Indian Bar Association before Home Secretary against him under various sections of IPC.
Section 153-A, 505(2) for spreading rumors, to incite hatred amongst group or class of people, Section 409 for misappropriation of public property, to give wrongful gain to vaccine companies.
As per research available with the Government and also as per the observations and law laid down by various high court and more particularly in thecase of Re: Dinthar Incident Aizawl Vs. State of Mizoram 2021 SCC OnLineGau 1313, there is no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Vaccinated people can also be super-spreaders. The Central government in its affidavit and High Courtstoo,in their judgments have made it clear that there cannot be any discrimination between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
But Shri. Naresh Mhaske, Mayor, Thane Mahanagarpalika, has made a false, defamatory and offensive remark against the unvaccinated people that they can spread infection and therefore cannot be permitted to travel through Thane Municipal Transport’s city buses.
The statement made by him is not only false and derogatory, but is an offence of spreading rumors to incite hatred between two groups of people.
The research done across the world and also admitted by Dr. Sanjay Rai, Epidemologist, AIIMS, New Delhi, that the person who has developed antibodies is the safest person in the world as he cannot spread infection. The persons who have developed antibodies are the safest persons in the world as they cannot spread infection.Their immunity is 13 times better than the fully vaccinated persons. Giving vaccine to such persons will cause more harm than good to the said persons and also it will be a waste of thousands of crores of public money.
However some corrupt officials, doctors and leaders, in order to give wrongful benefits of thousands of croresof rupees to vaccine manufacturing companies, are running ‘false narratives’ and ‘conspiracy theories’ that only vaccine is the protection from Covid-19.
लस घेतलेले व न घेतलेल्या लोकांमध्ये कोरोनाचा प्रसार करण्याबाबत काहीही फरक नाही हे लक्षात आल्यामुळे त्या दोघांना सारखेच प्रतिबंद लावण्याचे आदेश केंद्र सरकारने दिले. ज्यांना कोरोना होवून गेला आहे किंवा कोरोंना विषानूच्या संपर्कामुळे ज्यांच्या शरीरात नैसर्गिक प्रतिकार शक्ती निर्माण झाली आहे, तो व्यक्ती सर्वात जास्त सुरक्षित आहे. त्याला पुन्हा कोरोना होऊ शकत नाही. त्याची प्रतिकारशक्ती लस घेतलेल्या लोकांपेक्षा १३ पटीने जास्त चांगली आहे व आयुष्यभर टिकणारी असते. त्यांना लस देणे म्हणजे त्यांच्या शरीराला अपाय पोहचविणे आहे. अश्या लोकांनाच फक्त सर्व निर्बंधतून सूट दिली जावू शकते.
देशात असे ७०% पेक्षा जास्त लोक असून त्यांना जबरदस्तीने लस घेण्यास सांगण्यामागे भ्रष्ट अधिकाऱ्यांचा व भ्रष्ट नेत्यांच्या केवळ एकच हेतू होता तो म्हणजे शासनाच्या हजारो कोटी रुपयांच्या निधीची दुरुपयोग. शासनाचे सर्व निर्णय फक्त आणि फक्त लस कंपन्यांना फायदा मिळवून देण्यासाठी होते.
ठाण्याचे महापौर नरेश म्हस्के यांनी सुद्धा अकलेचे तारे तोडत 15 नोव्हेंबरला लोकमत न्यूज-18 ला दिलेल्या मुलाखतीत बेकायदेशीरपणे खोटे विधान केले की लस न घेतलेल्या लोकांकडून कोरोनाचा प्रसार होण्याची शक्यता जास्त आहे. म्हणून त्यांनी लस घ्यावी अन्यथा त्यांना लोकल बस मध्ये प्रवेश दिला जाणार नाही.
आपत्ती निवारण कायद्याचे कलम 38(1), 39(a) नुसार केंद्र शासनाच्या निर्देशाविरुद्ध जावून कोणतेही नियम आणण्याचा अधिकार नाही.
त्याबाबत मा. सर्वोच्च न्यायालय व उच्च न्यायालयाचे आदेश सुद्धा उपलब्ध असून ही बाब महाराष्ट्राचे आरोग्य मंत्री राजेश टोपे यांनी मान्य करत असेच बेकायदेशीर नियम आणणाऱ्या औरंगाबादचे जिल्हाधिकारी सुनील चव्हाण यांचे कान उपटले आहे.
एखाद्या अधिकाऱ्याने केंद्र शासनाच्या निर्देशाविरुद्ध जावून जर काम केले तर तो सरकारी अधिकारी व त्याच्या कार्यालयातील सर्व वरिष्ठ अधिकारी हे आपत्ती निवारण कायदा चे कलम 51 (b), 55 अंतर्गत 1 वर्ष तुरुंगवासाच्या शिक्षेस पात्र ठरतात.
तसेच साथरोगासंदर्भात कोणतीही खोटी अफवा पसरविणे हा कलम 54 अंतर्गत गुन्हा ठरतो.
त्यासंदर्भात नरेश म्हस्के व लोकमत न्यूज-18 चॅनलविरुद्ध इंडियन बार असोसिएशन च्या लीगल सेल प्रमुख अँड दिपाली ओझा यांनी गृह सचिव यांच्याकडे तक्रार दाखल करून त्वरीत गुन्हे दाखल करण्याची मागणी केली आहे.
या आधी सुद्धा महाराष्ट्र शासनाचे मुख्य सचिव व काही जिल्हाधिकाऱ्यांनी केंद्र शासनाच्या निर्देशाविरुद्ध जावून राज्यात एका जिल्ह्यातून दुसऱ्या जिल्ह्यात ये- करण्यासाठी ‘ई- पास’ ची सक्ती केली होती परंतु केंद्राचे गृह सचिव श्री. अजय भल्ला यांनी कठोर शब्दात कारवाईचे पत्र पाठविल्याबरोबर ती सक्ती उठविण्यात आली.
या आधी बंगाल चे मुख्य सचिव बंदोपाध्याय यांच्या विरुद्ध केंद्र शासनाने कारवाई केलेली आहे.
त्याशिवाय लस न घेतलेल्या लोकांसंदर्भात दोन गटात विद्वेष पसरविणारे कोणतेही विधान करणारा किंवा अफवा पसरविणारा आरोपी हा भादंवि 153(A), 505(2) अंतर्गत शिक्षेस पात्र ठरतो व त्याला त्याच्या गैरकृत्यात मदत करणारे इतर अधिकारी, व माहितीची शहानिशा न करता त्याचा प्रचार करणारे टीव्ही न्यूज चॅनल, पत्रकार, वर्तमानपत्राचे संपादक हे सर्व साक्षीपुरावा अधिनियमचे कलम 10 आणि भादंवि चे कलम 120(B), 34 नुसार सहआरोपी ठरतात.
आधी कोरोना होवून गेलेले व लस न घेतलेल्या अनेक लोकांनी नरेश म्हस्के यांच्याविरुद्ध मानहानीची कारवाई करण्याचा निर्णय घेतला असून मानव अधिकार सुरक्षा परिषदेचे महासचिव रशीद खान पठाण यांनी नरेश म्हस्के यांना त्यांचे वकील अॅड. तनवीर निझाम यांच्या मार्फत 50 कोटी रुपये नुकसान भरपाईची नोटीस पाठवल्याची माहिती असून नरेश मस्के विरुद्ध देशभरातील विविध न्यायालयात फौजदारी केसेस दाखल करण्यात येणार असल्याची माहिती अव्हेकन इंडिया मूव्हमेंट चे राष्ट्रीय कार्यकारीणी सदस्य अंबर कोइरी यांनी दिली.
‘कोव्हीशिल्ड’ लसींच्या दुष्परिणामामुळे औरंगाबादच्या डॉक्टर स्नेहल लूनावत यांचा मृत्यू झाल्याचे सरकारच्या समितीने मान्य केले असल्यामुळे लस पूर्णतः सुरक्षित आहे, असा प्रचार करणारे वैद्यकीय अधिकारी, महापौर, जिल्हाधिकारी आदीं विरुद्ध भारतीय दंड विधानचे कलम ३०२, ११५, ३०७, ३०४, ३०४(A), १२०(B), ३४, १०९, ४०९, १६६, १६७ आधी अंतर्गत फौजदारी कारवाई करण्यात येणार असल्याची माहिती इंडियन बार असोसिएशन चे अध्यक्ष अँड. निलेश ओझा यांनी दिली.
कोव्हीशिल्डच्या दुष्परिणामामुळे असे अनेक गंभीर आजार व त्रास झाल्याच्या तक्रारी असून नुकतेच मुंबईतील हितेश कडवे (वय 23) याचा मृत्यू झाला असून अनेक लोकांना हृदयविकाराचा झटका, लकवा, आंधळेपणा, बहिरेपणा असे दुष्परिणाम होत असल्याच्या तक्रारी आहेत..
लसीच्या दुष्परीणामामुळे लस घेणाऱ्यांचा जीव जावू शकतो. त्यांना बहिरेपणा, अर्धांगवायू, आंधळेपणा, रक्त गोठणे (Blood Clotting) असे गंभीर व जीवघेणे दुष्परीणाम होवू शकतात.
लसींच्या दुष्परिणामांमुळे लोकांचे मृत्यू होत असल्यामुळे 11 युरोपियन देशांनी कोव्हीशिल्ड (Astrazenica) या लसीला बंदी घातली होती.
देशात आतापर्यंत ४५०० पेक्षा जास्त लोकांचा मृत्यू लसीच्या दुष्परिणामांमुळे झाला आहे. कोरोना लसीच्या दुष्परिणामामुळे मरण पावलेल्या लोकांची माहिती देणाऱ्या वर्तमानपत्रात प्रकाशीत बातम्या खालील लिंक वर उपलब्ध आहेत.
कोरोना लसीच्या विविध दुष्परिणामांची माहिती सर्व नागरिकांना व लस घेणाऱ्या प्रत्येकाला देण्याची जबाबदारी ही लसीबाबतचे कोणतेही अभियान चालविणाऱ्या अधिकारी व कर्मचाऱ्यांनी कर्मचाऱ्यांची आहे. [Airdale NHS Trust Vs. Bland (1993) 1 All ER 821, Montgomery Vs. Lanarkshire Health Board  UKSC 11, Master Haridaan Kumar (Minor through and Ors.) Vs. UOI W.P. (C) 350/2019, Delhi High Court, Order dated 22.01.2019]
लसींच्या दुष्परीणामांची माहिती न देता दुष्परिणाम लपवून अर्धवट माहिती देवून फसवणूकिद्वारे लस पूर्णतः सुरक्षीत आहे असा खोटा प्रचार करुन कोरोना लसीचे डोस घेण्यास लोकांना प्रोत्साहित करने किंवा दबाव आणणे हा फौजदारी स्वरूपाचा गुन्हा घडतो व संबंधित अधिकारी व डॉक्टर्स हे नुकसान भरपाई देण्यास सुद्धा पात्र ठरतात. [Registrar General Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLine Megh 130, Ajay Gautam Vs. Amritsar Eye Clinc 2010 SCC OnLine NCDR 96]
लस घेतल्यानंतर कोरोना रोगापासून कोणतेही खात्रीलायक संरक्षण नाही. दोन्ही डोस घेतलेल्यांना कोरोना होवू शकतो व तो व्यक्ती कोरोनाने मरु शकतो. तसेच लसीचे दोन डोज घेतलेला व्यक्ती कोरोनाचा प्रसार दुसऱ्यांना करु शकतो. त्याच्यापासून दुसरी लोक सुरक्षीत नाहीत. त्याबाबत भारत सरकारचे रेकॉर्ड व त्याआधारे दिलेले उच्च न्यायालयाचे आदेश आदी पुरावे उपलब्ध आहेत.
मुंबईतील के. ई. एम. मेडीकल कॉलेज च्या विद्यार्थ्यांमध्ये 29 कोरोना रुग्णांपैकी 27 रुग्णांनी लसींचे दोन डोज घेतले होते. म्हणजेच लस घेतलेल्या 93% लोकांना कोरोनाचा संसर्ग होण्याचा धोका आहे.
नागपूर येथे कोरोनाची बाधा झालेल्या १३ रुग्णांपैकी लसींचे दोन्ही डोज घेणारे १२ लोक होते. म्हणजेच लस घेणाऱ्यांना संसर्गाची भीती ही सर्वात जास्त (92%) आहे.
बेंगलोर येथे इस्पीतळात येणाऱ्या नवीन कोरोना रुग्णांमध्ये लस घेतलेल्या लोकांचे प्रमाण अधिक आहे.
नॅशनल टेक्निकल अँडव्हायझरी ग्रुप ऑफ इम्युनायझेशन (NTIAGI) चे पूर्व सदस्य श्री. जॅकोब पुलियल यांनी सर्वोच्च न्यायालयात W.P. No. 607 of 2021 मध्ये दि. रोजी दाखल शपथपत्रा सोबत स्पष्ट पुरावे दिले आहेत की लस घेणाऱ्या लोकांमध्ये कोरोनाचा संसर्ग वाढण्याचे व मृत्यूचे प्रमाण अधिक आहे.
इंडियन मेडिकल असोसिएशन चे पूर्व अध्यक्ष के.के. अग्रवाल व दिल्लीतील 60 डॉक्टर्स ज्यांनी कोरोना लसीचे दोन्ही डोस घेतले होते त्यांचा मृत्यू कोरोनानेच झाला होता.
केन्द्र शासनाचा आरोग्य मंत्रालयाने दि. २०.०९.२०२१ रोजी दिलेल्या उत्तरामध्ये स्पष्ट केले आहे की लस घेतल्यामुळे काय फायदा होतो याचा कोणताही निष्कर्ष अजून काढण्यात आलेला नाही.
Download Related Documents :-
इंडियन बार असोसिएशन कडून केलेल्या तक्रारीची प्रत तुम्ही डाउनलोड करण्यासाठी क्लिक करा.